"KAP leader and son of the party’s founder, Robert ‘Robbie’ Katter, argued that the harm done by early sexualisation of children by exposure to “adult sexual behaviour” could damage the “foundation they need to become adults who are capable of forming positive, caring sexual relationships”."
Proposal to limit advertising
So what type of advertising do you think is reasonable in public. I don't see anyway to limit the audience and therefore we need to consider public only. What I find absolutely astounding is that groups such as the KAP, PUP and ACL believe that children should not be 'exposed' to sexualised advertising. SERIOUSLY? We need to be clear what the ACL et. al. are trying to avoid. It is not sexualised advertising, it is anything that reflects non-heterosexual advertising.
There is sexualised advertising everywhere.
Here is a few
When was the last time you saw a woman draped over a car?
When was the last time you saw a women in an unbuttoned shirt or underwear - selling something that isn't clothes?
When was the last time you saw a man, half naked selling some inanimate object or person product?
We see sexualised advertising everywhere. What we see is hetero-normative and therefore something we either don't register or do not see on the 'offensive' or 'questionable' spectrum. The first sign of a homosexual relationship in advertising causes an uproar. Is this not a fundamental concern?
Your thoughts are welcome.
A
Copyright Adele Fisher 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment